|
Boost : |
From: Mat Marcus (mat-lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-24 17:40:04
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Mat Marcus wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:53 AM, James Talbut <James.Talbut_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> There have been various discussions on here about the problems caused by
> >> _SECURE_SCL, but I haven't seen any concrete plans for changes to boost
> >> build to handle it.
> >>
> >> At a minimum the build system should be changed to enable those users
> >> wanting _SECURE_SCL=0 to do so easily - ideally by providing an argument
> >> to bjam.
> >>
> >> Is someone working on this?
> >
> > I'd love to see someone pick up the ball on this one. For what it's
> > worth, I've patched my local msvc.jam to add the feature:
> >
> > feature.feature stl-security-theater : off on : propagated link-incompatible ;
> >
> > flags msvc.compile C++FLAGS <stl-security-theater>off : /D_SECURE_SCL=0 ;
> > flags msvc.compile C++FLAGS <stl-security-theater>on : /D_SCL_SECURE=1 ;
> >
> > As a result of our analysis of the benefits vs. performance of the
> > "feature", I've set _SECURE_SCL=0 off by default. I asked on the build
> > list how to augment library name mangling to make it safer, but
> > haven't received a reply yet, so I may have to study a bit to make it
> > better. But I will probably just ship it as above with Adobe Source
> > Libraries 1.037.
>
> Hi Mat,
>
> Is it the secure SCL that is causing your problem, or more specifically
> the iterator debugging feature? I agree that MSVC's iterator debugging
> can cause huge performance problems, and I've had to disable it in the
> accumulator's tests to get them to complete in any reasonable amount of
> time.
[snip]
I maintain that _SECURE_SCL must be 0 by default for (at least)
*release* builds. This is different from the MS default. I posted my
rationale and some benchmark results at http://easyurl.net/high_cost ,
in case you are interested. As far as I know iterator debugging is not
turned on by default for release builds, so it is not my primary
concern here. Please let me know if I have missed something, though.
Thanks for the suggestion,
Mat
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk