From: Michael Fawcett (michael.fawcett_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-27 22:05:50
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 9:39 PM, David Abrahams
> on Thu Mar 06 2008, "Michael Fawcett" <michael.fawcett-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Sebastian Redl
> > <sebastian.redl_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> Michael Fawcett wrote:
> >> > I forgot to mention before that this is using VS 2005 as the compiler.
> >> > I'm pretty sure results for compilers with different exception
> >> > implementations would vary greatly.
> >> >
> >> I imagine that a Linux/GCC build would indeed show quite different
> >> results. Do you have the platform available, or a an easily
> >> compilable/runnable test case for someone else to run?
> > I have cygwin available. This might take some time to do though, I'll
> > try to get around to it before the end of the week.
> Cygwin won't tell us much; it uses essentially the same crappy SJLJ
> exception implementation that VS uses in 32-bit mode, IIRC.
I don't know much about Cygwin, but the results were very different
from Cygwin/gcc vs Windows/VS 2005. Why this was, I have no clue and
never investigated further.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk