|
Boost : |
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-28 13:18:50
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 28 April 2008 12:32 pm, Daniel Frey wrote:
> The main point of BOOST_ASSERT(_shared_count.empty()) is to catch more
> cases than the current test. It breaks three test cases, so once again:
> Are these tests correct and by design or do they pass by accident?
They are correct, in that I was testing that my implementation behaved the way
I expected it to. So they are by design, but only my own design. The
details of what the esft destructor should choke on are not something that
have been discussed in depth before.
- --
Frank
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIFgb75vihyNWuA4URAn3tAKDdpvL5/DC8LQFTMDSJpGMiuQPWnwCgldyB
3cy3lGaQusSFTf+AwP4NqIs=
=JUbJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk