Boost logo

Boost :

From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-05 11:13:52


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 04 May 2008 09:09 am, Daniel Frey wrote:
> Oops, it lacked an ADL protector (see the corrected version attached).
> This shows that the current regression tests do not catch this problem
> (it was triggered by libs/signals/src/connection.cpp for example). Which
> raises the question whether or not the specification should allow an ADL
> protector. Personally, I would like to see that, even that it's
> required. Opinions?

What is an ADL protector? I'm not familiar with that idea. I see you added a
namespace and a using statement, but what problem does it solve?

- --
Frank
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIHyQ25vihyNWuA4URArZJAKCFGFYq51FhqNmFutKotNG1pv8SNwCeOMx0
OJHBlU8azHXaPBD7aMWSy1s=
=sPGN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk