From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-05 11:13:52
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sunday 04 May 2008 09:09 am, Daniel Frey wrote:
> Oops, it lacked an ADL protector (see the corrected version attached).
> This shows that the current regression tests do not catch this problem
> (it was triggered by libs/signals/src/connection.cpp for example). Which
> raises the question whether or not the specification should allow an ADL
> protector. Personally, I would like to see that, even that it's
> required. Opinions?
What is an ADL protector? I'm not familiar with that idea. I see you added a
namespace and a using statement, but what problem does it solve?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk