Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] enable_shared_from_this / sp_accept_owner / virtual dtor

From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-05 11:13:52

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 04 May 2008 09:09 am, Daniel Frey wrote:
> Oops, it lacked an ADL protector (see the corrected version attached).
> This shows that the current regression tests do not catch this problem
> (it was triggered by libs/signals/src/connection.cpp for example). Which
> raises the question whether or not the specification should allow an ADL
> protector. Personally, I would like to see that, even that it's
> required. Opinions?

What is an ADL protector?  I'm not familiar with that idea.  I see you added a 
namespace and a using statement, but what problem does it solve?

- -- 
Frank
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIHyQ25vihyNWuA4URArZJAKCFGFYq51FhqNmFutKotNG1pv8SNwCeOMx0
OJHBlU8azHXaPBD7aMWSy1s=
=sPGN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----