Re: [boost] Profiling template instantiations

From: Boris Gubenko (Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-09 14:22:20

Steven Watanabe wrote:
> I only see function template instantiations, I'm more interested in
> class template instantiations because that's where the metaprogramming
> is done.  Am I missing something?

What example in my previous mail shows is names of member functions of
class templates being automatically instantiated, along with template
arguments they are instantiated on. The output of verbose template
instantiation mode serves us well for building common instantiation
libraries and this is, probably, why reporting of class template
instantiations was never requested.

I'm not suggesting cxx as a replacement for your tool. As I said in
the previous mail, this is fyi :-)

Thanks,
  Boris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <boost_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] Profiling template instantiations

>
> AMDG
>
> Boris Gubenko wrote:
>> Steven Watanabe wrote:
>>
>>> Ok.  It would be great if compilers supported this directly.
>>>
>>
>> Just fyi: the cxx compiler has verbose template instantiation
>> mode. On Tru64, for example:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>
>
> I only see function template instantiations, I'm more interested in
> class template instantiations because that's where the metaprogramming
> is done.  Am I missing something?
>
> I'd also like to have all template instantiations, not just those
> that are triggered from inside other template instantiations.
> (Although this doesn't make a huge difference)
>
> In Christ,
> Steven Watanabe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>