From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-09 14:56:00
Boris Gubenko wrote:
> Steven Watanabe wrote:
>> I only see function template instantiations, I'm more interested in
>> class template instantiations because that's where the metaprogramming
>> is done. Am I missing something?
> What example in my previous mail shows is names of member functions of
> class templates being automatically instantiated, along with template
> arguments they are instantiated on. The output of verbose template
> instantiation mode serves us well for building common instantiation
> libraries and this is, probably, why reporting of class template
> instantiations was never requested.
> I'm not suggesting cxx as a replacement for your tool. As I said in
> the previous mail, this is fyi :-)
OK. I just thought that iff cxx provided an easy way to get
that information, I could process that output rather than using
the uglier method of generating warnings. Since I already have
support for other compilers, its not that bad though.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk