|
Boost : |
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-15 12:14:13
If possible I'd like to see a fix for: http://tinyurl.com/3uz5xg
Looks like we just need to add FreeBSD to the list of OS's that don't define
SIGPOLL at the start of execution_monitor.ipp. The strange thing is, the
other FreeBSD tester doesn't fail here... anyone know what the difference is
between them? Both define XOPEN_UNIX to be -1 so they're both advertising
that they *don't* support this XSI-specific feature. Come to that are these
symbols all macros? Could we just check for defined(SIGPOLL) ?
Cheers, John.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk