Re: [boost] [test] SIGPOLL not defined on FreeBSD?

From: Alex Ott (alexott_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-26 16:04:55

Hello

I can confirm this.  I had tried to build boost 1.35 on freebsd 6.2 and
found this bug.  There is also some problems with suboptions to SIGCHLD and
other signals - i can look for log at my vmware.

>>>>> "JM" == John Maddock writes:
 JM> If possible I'd like to see a fix for: http://tinyurl.com/3uz5xg Looks
 JM> like we just need to add FreeBSD to the list of OS's that don't define
 JM> SIGPOLL at the start of execution_monitor.ipp.  The strange thing is,
 JM> the other FreeBSD tester doesn't fail here... anyone know what the
 JM> difference is between them?  Both define XOPEN_UNIX to be -1 so
 JM> they're both advertising that they *don't* support this XSI-specific
 JM> feature.  Come to that are these symbols all macros?  Could we just
 JM> check for defined(SIGPOLL) ?

-- 
With best wishes, Alex Ott, MBA
http://alexott.blogspot.com/        http://xtalk.msk.su/~ott/
http://alexott-ru.blogspot.com/