From: Alex Ott (alexott_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-26 16:04:55
I can confirm this. I had tried to build boost 1.35 on freebsd 6.2 and
found this bug. There is also some problems with suboptions to SIGCHLD and
other signals - i can look for log at my vmware.
>>>>> "JM" == John Maddock writes:
JM> If possible I'd like to see a fix for: http://tinyurl.com/3uz5xg Looks
JM> like we just need to add FreeBSD to the list of OS's that don't define
JM> SIGPOLL at the start of execution_monitor.ipp. The strange thing is,
JM> the other FreeBSD tester doesn't fail here... anyone know what the
JM> difference is between them? Both define XOPEN_UNIX to be -1 so
JM> they're both advertising that they *don't* support this XSI-specific
JM> feature. Come to that are these symbols all macros? Could we just
JM> check for defined(SIGPOLL) ?
-- With best wishes, Alex Ott, MBA http://alexott.blogspot.com/ http://xtalk.msk.su/~ott/ http://alexott-ru.blogspot.com/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk