Re: [boost] Egg review result

From: Giovanni Piero Deretta (gpderetta_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-17 19:14:10

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:59 AM, dan marsden <danmarsden_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> This is a summary of the review of the Egg library by Shunsuke Sogame.
> [...]
> * The number of reviews was insufficient to accept the library in its current form. This seemed to be due to documentation issues making reviews difficult, and the poor timing of the review before Boostcon.

I really hope that Shunsuke will resubmit the library again.
Hopefully not at the same time of next Boostcon, so that we can get
more reviews :)

> * The library was of high technical quality, and the functionality was needed by Boost users in some form.

Definitely!

> * Documentation issues would definitely need to be addressed before the library could be satisfactorily reviewed and accepted into Boost.

I volunteer again to help with the documentation.

-- 
gpd