From: Jurko GospodnetiÄ (jurko.gospodnetic_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-19 12:35:32
> I renamed the local CRITICAL_SECTION to critical_section to avoid this
> ambiguity. See revision 45545.
Could you also add the comment from the original patch to explain why
this has been done? Since there are no tests prepared that would catch
this if it ever regressed...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk