From: John Femiani (JOHN.FEMIANI_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-22 16:42:41
> > Oops, your right. 'back' would be a lot better, given the c++
> > precedent (std::list).
> Indeed. back() is excellent.
> Still, does it justify breaking backwards compatibility?
I suggested to deprecate, rather than removing anything, in order to
avoid breaking backwards compatibility.
I just meant to suggest documenting it as deprecated.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk