From: John Femiani (JOHN.FEMIANI_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-23 03:52:22
> David Abrahams wrote:
> > It's easy enough to leave them deprecated, or even officially
> > but available for backward-compatibility.
> Did you read all the messages in this thread? If you want to rename
> to 'basename',
> you cannot do that without breaking backward compatibility (no matter
> you leave 'leaf'
> around as deprecated).
Is there anything wrong with back()? Can we add back() and deprecate
(not remove, just deprecate) leaf()?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk