Re: [boost] [date_time] boost time lacking tic-tac

From: Frank Birbacher (bloodymir.crap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-23 03:10:22

Hi!

Joachim Faulhaber schrieb:
> which is nice. Yet as for date/time parameters for my interval and
> interval containers templates  my implementation relies on the
> existence of incrementation on the least available time unit in order
> to decide things like
> [1704, 4712) == [1704, 4711]

I suggest to let the user specify a minimal unit. Depending on the 
application the user could think in seconds or less (time measuring for 
events), minutes (calendar application), days (hotel room occupation), 
months/years (records of employment).

I'd like that.

> Based on
> this property incrementation and decrementation can always be
> implemented.

For instance using a specified increment. :)

Regards,
Frank