From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-29 11:46:30
Douglas Gregor wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 09:58 -0400, Beman Dawes wrote:
>> Beman Dawes wrote:
>>> BOOST_NO_UNICODE_LITERALS // no Unicode literals
>> Grrr... At least one compiler beta is supporting u and U literals, but
>> not U8 literals.
> Will that vendor be supporting U8 literals before the final release? We
> don't need to cope with non-released compilers.
Good point. The product manager actually thought UTF-8 literals were
supporting, so maybe they will appear in the final release.
We can always just define BOOST_NO_UNICODE_LITERALS until all three
flavors are fully supported. That probably makes more sense.
For every macro, a separate test case .ipp file has to be written and
then tested for every compiler. Given the number of new C++0x features,
the Boost macros will become unmanageable if they are too fine grained.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk