From: Anthony Williams (anthony.ajw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-30 16:16:39
"vicente.botet" <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anthony Williams" <anthony.ajw_at_[hidden]>
>> OK. This is similar to what I've done with detail::future_waiter. I
>> could probably extend it to provide a full future that had the
>> semantics of the future_or I posted earlier. I'll have a look next week.
> Do you mean that future_waiter will be public and not a implementation
I mean that something based on future_waiter would be public, yes.
-- Anthony Williams | Just Software Solutions Ltd Custom Software Development | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk Registered in England, Company Number 5478976. Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk