From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-31 07:39:22
Edd Dawson wrote:
> No different. Except it would work on Windows, whereas a pth-based
> implementation of Boost.Thread wouldn't (AFAICT).
Pth means Portable threads.
The whole point of pth is that it is fully platform independent, since
it only uses setjmp/longjmp (of course it can use more efficient if
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk