From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-02 14:10:19
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
> Also, personally I am
> strongly against including windows-specific or POSIX-specific headers
> in boost headers.
Given that the header in question is already windows specific I don't
understand how including
a windows specific header will make it any worse.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk