From: Giovanni Piero Deretta (gpderetta_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-03 09:27:18
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>> Also, personally I am
>> strongly against including windows-specific or POSIX-specific headers
>> in boost headers.
> Given that the header in question is already windows specific I don't
> understand how including
> a windows specific header will make it any worse.
I think that the problem is global namespace pollution. Windows
headers are particularly known to define common names as macros. And
posix headers are often 'dirty' too.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk