From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-02 17:24:59
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve:
> Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately, it doesn't help in my case, because
> I have a x86_64 platform.
> I blindly tried all includes I could find in the Intel C++ directory,
> but none helped.
> A look at the docs also didn't lead to any insights...
> Is there something else I could try?
Well... you could ask Intel via Beman or John Maddock who are our points of
contact at the moment. :-)
In the meantime we'll probably need to add
&& ( !defined(__INTEL_COMPILER) || defined(__ia64) )
to the line in detail/spinlock.hpp that chooses the _sync path. But it would
be nice to have an official word from Intel as to whether the __sync
intrinsics are (going to be?) supported on x86-64.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk