From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-05 13:36:31
> Though the comment in the code is correct, there is already a macro
> for that in boost/config/compiler/visualc.hpp:
FWIW, this macro breaks the convention that the BOOST_NO_* prefix is
reserved for defects, whereas BOOST_HAS_* is for features. This of course
doesn't make the change you object to correct.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk