From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-06 04:21:31
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Anthony Williams:
>> Though the comment in the code is correct, there is already a macro
>> for that in boost/config/compiler/visualc.hpp:
> FWIW, this macro breaks the convention that the BOOST_NO_* prefix is
> reserved for defects, whereas BOOST_HAS_* is for features. This of
> course doesn't make the change you object to correct.
Yep, and also got added without tests or docs which is why I missed it, I've
opened a trac issue on it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk