Re: [boost] Updated version of futures library

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-06 16:04:08

Frank Mori Hess:

> I'm not quite sure what you're driving at with the above 2 paragraphs. 
> Are you satisfied with your pseudocode scheduler's performance, or no?

I'm not sure, as it's hard to measure the performance of a pseudocode. :-)

To see how it fares, we need a benchmark based on a workload that is 
representative for your intended use cases... one that cannot be trivially 
rewritten to perform better using an alternative concurrency model. ;-)