From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-06 16:04:08
Frank Mori Hess:
> I'm not quite sure what you're driving at with the above 2 paragraphs.
> Are you satisfied with your pseudocode scheduler's performance, or no?
I'm not sure, as it's hard to measure the performance of a pseudocode. :-)
To see how it fares, we need a benchmark based on a workload that is
representative for your intended use cases... one that cannot be trivially
rewritten to perform better using an alternative concurrency model. ;-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk