Re: [boost] [ptr_container] Failures for ptr_set and ptr_unordered_set on Intel, Acc, and Cxx

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-12 10:16:31

Thorsten Ottosen wrote:

> I've removed the two other functions, because the one with two template 
> arguments is more general. It's committed to trunk, so let's see how it 
> goes.

With your last commit, the tests ptr_set and ptr_unordered_set now pass for 
me on Cxx without any warnings or errors. Most likely Intel and Acc are now 
happy, too.

Thank you,
Markus