|
Boost :
|
- Next message: Stephan Diederich: "[boost] [concept_check] fails with types declared in anonymous namespace (gcc 4.2.3)"
- Previous message: Kevin Sopp: "Re: [boost] [hash] Is there any interest in cryptographic hash functions?"
- Next in thread: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [date-time][threads] Integrating C++0x clocks, time points, and durations into Boost?"
- Reply: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [date-time][threads] Integrating C++0x clocks, time points, and durations into Boost?"
- Reply: Paul A Bristow: "Re: [boost] [date-time][threads] Integrating C++0x clocks, time points, and durations into Boost?"
- Reply: Anthony Williams: "Re: [boost] [date-time][threads] Integrating C++0x clocks, time points, and durations into Boost?"
- Reply: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [date-time][threads] Integrating C++0x clocks, time points, and durations into Boost?"
A slightly updated version of
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2008/n2615.html was
accepted at the C++ committee meeting last week. It provides clocks,
time points, and time durations for the C++0x standard library, and
slightly modifies the threads interface already voted into C++0x to use
these features. The only change in the version of the proposal actually
voted in, IIRC, was to leave identity alone. The final document will
appear in the post-meeting mailing in about two weeks.
Although these clock and time features evolved from Boost Date-Time, the
actual realization is quite different. So we've got a transition that
has to be managed. I'd personally like to see that transition occur
quickly, both because Boost.Threads depends on these features, and
because I can now bring forward an improved Boost.Timer based on these
features.
One suggestion is for Boost to provide an implementation of the headers
to be added to C++0x, and then to use those headers in the various Boost
libraries that need them. But I haven't thought it out in any detail.
How should we proceed? Comments? Ideas? Suggestions?
--Beman
- Next message: Stephan Diederich: "[boost] [concept_check] fails with types declared in anonymous namespace (gcc 4.2.3)"
- Previous message: Kevin Sopp: "Re: [boost] [hash] Is there any interest in cryptographic hash functions?"
- Next in thread: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [date-time][threads] Integrating C++0x clocks, time points, and durations into Boost?"
- Reply: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [boost] [date-time][threads] Integrating C++0x clocks, time points, and durations into Boost?"
- Reply: Paul A Bristow: "Re: [boost] [date-time][threads] Integrating C++0x clocks, time points, and durations into Boost?"
- Reply: Anthony Williams: "Re: [boost] [date-time][threads] Integrating C++0x clocks, time points, and durations into Boost?"
- Reply: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [date-time][threads] Integrating C++0x clocks, time points, and durations into Boost?"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk