Re: [boost] [1.36.0] Release schedule set

From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-23 07:11:11

Hi,

Have you tried to merge to the release branch already. I have see that units 
and accumulators have been added recently.

Vicente

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Emil Dotchevski" <emil_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] [1.36.0] Release schedule set

>
> I am following the traffic on this mailing list yet the first time I
> noticed anything about releasing  1.36 it was the message informing me
> that technically I'm late to merge Boost Exception into the release
> branch. Maybe I have missed an earlier message but I think we should
> be getting more reminders here.
>
> Emil Dotchevski
> Reverge Studios, Inc.
> http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode
>
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 6:14 PM, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> James Sharpe wrote:
>>> You see its this lack of flexibility and clarity that naming a branch
>>> release brings. I refer you to my earlier suggestion of including the
>>> release number in the branch name to remove ambiguity and make it
>>> easier to create for example 1.35.1 whilst release 1.36.0 is in
>>> progress since it is clear where fixes should go.
>>
>> I agree with this suggestion.  Naming the branch "release" does seem a
>> bit like needless invention where an industry-standard practice would do
>> the job better.  Am I missing something?
>>
>> --
>> Dave Abrahams
>> BoostPro Computing
>> http://www.boostpro.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>