Boost logo

Boost :

From: Emil Dotchevski (emil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-23 02:25:49

I am following the traffic on this mailing list yet the first time I
noticed anything about releasing 1.36 it was the message informing me
that technically I'm late to merge Boost Exception into the release
branch. Maybe I have missed an earlier message but I think we should
be getting more reminders here.

Emil Dotchevski
Reverge Studios, Inc.

On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 6:14 PM, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> James Sharpe wrote:
>> You see its this lack of flexibility and clarity that naming a branch
>> release brings. I refer you to my earlier suggestion of including the
>> release number in the branch name to remove ambiguity and make it
>> easier to create for example 1.35.1 whilst release 1.36.0 is in
>> progress since it is clear where fixes should go.
> I agree with this suggestion. Naming the branch "release" does seem a
> bit like needless invention where an industry-standard practice would do
> the job better. Am I missing something?
> --
> Dave Abrahams
> BoostPro Computing
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at