Re: [boost] range_ex: status?

From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-24 09:17:42

AMDG

Neil Groves wrote:
>> Also, I think you should add to the documentation that the functors need
>>  to have result_type (or be real functions).
>> It might be interesting to make it so decltype/typeof/emulation can be
>> used instead, by the way. It shouldn't be too difficult to wrap the
>> function objects so that result_type can be automatically deduced, since
>> in all cases the types of all arguments are fixed.
>>   
> I will look into this suggestion. To be perfectly honest I am not sure 
> how to make it work for all
> function types. I suspect that a good look around the other Boost 
> libraries or search engines will
> reveal a solution. This may take me longer due to my lack of 
> experience with this approach.

Can't you use result_of?

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe