Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Chris Newbold (Chris.Newbold_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-26 11:36:33

Next message: dherring_at_[hidden]: "Re: [boost] [inspect] Hall of Shame plus non-ASCII characters"
Previous message: Frank Mori Hess: "Re: [boost] [utility/swap] Okay to add array support to Boost.Swap(sandbox/swap)?"
Next in thread: Anthony Williams: "Re: [boost] [thread] Backwards compatibility for timed_lock?"
Reply: Anthony Williams: "Re: [boost] [thread] Backwards compatibility for timed_lock?"

We're in the process of upgrading to 1.35 and have discovered that there are no timed_lock() overloads accepting the old xtime structure. Was this intentional or an oversight? It isn't mentioned in the list of "breaking changes" in the 1.35 release notes.

For example, timed_wait() does have overloads for xtime...

-Chris

Next message: dherring_at_[hidden]: "Re: [boost] [inspect] Hall of Shame plus non-ASCII characters"
Previous message: Frank Mori Hess: "Re: [boost] [utility/swap] Okay to add array support to Boost.Swap(sandbox/swap)?"
Next in thread: Anthony Williams: "Re: [boost] [thread] Backwards compatibility for timed_lock?"
Reply: Anthony Williams: "Re: [boost] [thread] Backwards compatibility for timed_lock?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk