Re: [boost] [thread] Backwards compatibility for timed_lock?

From: Anthony Williams (anthony.ajw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-26 14:51:09

Chris Newbold <Chris.Newbold_at_[hidden]> writes:

> We're in the process of upgrading to 1.35 and have discovered that
> there are no timed_lock() overloads accepting the old xtime
> structure. Was this intentional or an oversight? It isn't mentioned
> in the list of "breaking changes" in the 1.35 release notes.
>
> For example, timed_wait() does have overloads for xtime...

It's an oversight. I intended uses of xtime to work as before. Please
file a trac ticket.

Anthony
-- 
Anthony Williams            | Just Software Solutions Ltd
Custom Software Development | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk
Registered in England, Company Number 5478976.
Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL