Re: [boost] [thread] Backwards compatibility for timed_lock?

From: Chris Newbold (Chris.Newbold_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-26 15:07:04

> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]
> On Behalf Of Anthony Williams
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:51 PM

> Chris Newbold <Chris.Newbold_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> > We're in the process of upgrading to 1.35 and have discovered that
> > there are no timed_lock() overloads accepting the old xtime
> > structure. Was this intentional or an oversight? It isn't mentioned
> > in the list of "breaking changes" in the 1.35 release notes.
> >
> > For example, timed_wait() does have overloads for xtime...
>
> It's an oversight. I intended uses of xtime to work as before. Please
> file a trac ticket.

Done. See http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/2052

-Chris