Re: [boost] [1.36.0] RELEASE BRANCH OPEN FOR BUG FIXES

From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-27 09:07:57

AMDG

Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>> Why should an incremental test fail in this case?  If you don't know,
>> there's a mystery waiting to be uncovered and you shouldn't be so sure
>> that it's a false positive in this case.
>>     
>
> This is not a compiler or library bug; it is specific to
> http://www.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/RudbekAssociates-V2.html.
>
> Incremental MSVC builds at other sites work fine. I'm pretty sure that
> this particular problem has persisted for months now. I've tried to
> contact them before without success.
>   

Did you notice the line number?

..\libs\exception\test\throw_exception_test.cpp(55):
test 'false' failed in function
'void __cdecl tester<struct boost::exception_test::some_boost_exception>(void)'

Something is a little funny here because the test is on line 57.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe