Re: [boost] [test] RFC: speed up BOOST_CHECK by not formatting the check description if it isn't written anywhere

From: K. Noel Belcourt (kbelco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-09 10:26:23

On Jul 8, 2008, at 11:08 PM, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:

> Ji <jpalecek <at> web.de> writes:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a test that uses many BOOST_CHECKs (~ 10 thousands or so).  
>> Running that
> test is very slow and I have
>> noticed most of the time is spent by formatting the description  
>> string to be
> passed to check_impl, only to
>> be ignored, because I don't want to log successful checks (and  
>> they are
> successful).
>>
>> I have improved this by using some kind of expression template for  
>> this
> (called lazy_output). It works like this:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks you very much for the idea. I've implemented it a bit  
> differently and
> extended to support manipulators. Also I've integrated it with UTF  
> internals a
> bit  more. Checked into svn in 47258.

Hi Gennadiy,

Is this change

http://www.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/output/Sandia- 
intel-10-0-boost-bin-v2-libs-config-test-limits_test-test-intel- 
linux-10-0-debug-link-static.html

related to these problems?

I was gone for a while and didn't notice when these BOOST_CHECK  
errors began showing up.

-- Noel