Re: [boost] Concept based overloading and the ODR

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-11 12:28:03

on Fri Jul 11 2008, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm thinking that the most reliable way to deal with this is to
> /always/ provide forward declarations of functions that
> should be found by ADL, even if they are defined in a separate
> header.

That's a good answer.  However, note that the first link you posted was
from someone who wouldn't want such a declaration to be seen.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com