|
Boost :
|
- Next message: Steven Ross: "Re: [boost] Proposed templated integer_sort"
- Previous message: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [boost] add new category in libs/libraries.htm"
- In reply to: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31: "Re: [boost] [swap] How to fix ADL barrier for XL, Intel, GCC, Sun and Como?"
- Next in thread: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 : "Re: [boost] [swap] How to fix ADL barrier for XL, Intel, GCC, Sun and Como?"
- Reply: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 : "Re: [boost] [swap] How to fix ADL barrier for XL, Intel, GCC, Sun and Como?"
- Reply: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2010-10-10: "Re: [boost] [swap] How to fix ADL barrier for XL, Intel, GCC, Sun and Como?"
on Wed Jul 30 2008, "Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31" <nd_mail_address_valid_until_2008-12-31-AT-xs4all.nl> wrote:
> So... is it worth reporting the compiler bug to Microsoft? Because
> MSVC suggested that the using-declaration would provide an ADL
> barrier. Until today, I considered it a "feature", not a bug!
All bugs are worth reporting.
--
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com
- Next message: Steven Ross: "Re: [boost] Proposed templated integer_sort"
- Previous message: Emil Dotchevski: "Re: [boost] add new category in libs/libraries.htm"
- In reply to: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31: "Re: [boost] [swap] How to fix ADL barrier for XL, Intel, GCC, Sun and Como?"
- Next in thread: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 : "Re: [boost] [swap] How to fix ADL barrier for XL, Intel, GCC, Sun and Como?"
- Reply: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 : "Re: [boost] [swap] How to fix ADL barrier for XL, Intel, GCC, Sun and Como?"
- Reply: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2010-10-10: "Re: [boost] [swap] How to fix ADL barrier for XL, Intel, GCC, Sun and Como?"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk