|
Boost :
|
- Next message: David Walthall: "Re: [boost] [swap] End-user allowed to add overloads to boost namespace?"
- Previous message: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 : "Re: [boost] [swap] How to fix ADL barrier for XL, Intel, GCC, Sun and Como?"
- In reply to: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 : "Re: [boost] [swap] How to fix ADL barrier for XL, Intel, GCC, Sun and Como?"
- Next in thread: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 : "Re: [boost] [swap] How to fix ADL barrier for XL, Intel, GCC, Sun and Como?"
- Reply: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 : "Re: [boost] [swap] How to fix ADL barrier for XL, Intel, GCC, Sun and Como?"
AMDG
Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 wrote:
> Steven Watanabe wrote:
>
>> The using declaration isn't supposed to work.
>>
>
> So do you think it's safe to remove the swap_adl_barrier namespace from
> http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/boost/utility/swap.hpp now? (See
> attached patch)
>
Yes. As it doesn't do any good, it's better to remove it to avoid
confusing people.
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe
- Next message: David Walthall: "Re: [boost] [swap] End-user allowed to add overloads to boost namespace?"
- Previous message: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 : "Re: [boost] [swap] How to fix ADL barrier for XL, Intel, GCC, Sun and Como?"
- In reply to: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 : "Re: [boost] [swap] How to fix ADL barrier for XL, Intel, GCC, Sun and Como?"
- Next in thread: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 : "Re: [boost] [swap] How to fix ADL barrier for XL, Intel, GCC, Sun and Como?"
- Reply: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 : "Re: [boost] [swap] How to fix ADL barrier for XL, Intel, GCC, Sun and Como?"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk