From: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 (nd_mail_address_valid_until_2008-12-31_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-31 04:52:11
David Walthall wrote:
> It seems like users should not be allowed to add to the boost::
> Here is my reasoning: if users are allowed to add to the boost
> namespace, what happens when/if that library (to which the user is
> adding code) becomes part of the standard and is moved to std::?
> Either the rule against adding to std:: would need to be relaxed or
> user code would break when the library becomes part of std::.
Good point! Thanks for your feedback, David.
> The only exception I can see is if it is a work-around for a compiler
> that isn't standards compliant since the compiler will (presumably) be
> updated and not need the work-around at the point that the library is
> added to the std:: namespace. (I'm not sure if this boost::swap issue
> falls under this exception.)
Yes, my question was really based upon the fact that for some compilers,
the end user might want to add a boost::swap overload, because of
missing compiler support for argument-dependent lookup (ADL).
Anyway, I still want to see if we can somehow work around those ADL
related compiler bugs within the boost::swap utility itself. But before
doing so, I would like to see "test_adl_barrier" go green on the
Which seems like just a matter of time :-)
Kind regards, Niels
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk