From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-31 13:05:55
Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 wrote:
> Joseph Gauterin wrote:
>> Am I correct in thinking that it's permissible to provide a template
>> specialization of a function in namespace std but not an overload?
> Yes, you are. :-) According to both the current C++ Standard and the
> latest Working Draft. The Draft
> www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2008/n2691.pdf says at
> 18.104.22.168.1, Namespace std [namespace.std]:
> "The behavior of a C++ program is undefined if it adds declarations or
> definitions to namespace std or to a namespace within namespace std
> unless otherwise specified. A program may add a template specialization
> for any standard library template to namespace std only if the
> declaration depends on a user-defined type of external linkage and the
> specialization meets the standard library requirements for the original
Speaking of swap, ADL, and the next standard...
I remember reading or hearing a long time ago that in C++0x it is an
error to call std::swap(x,y) directly and you have to do using
std::swap; swap(x,y);. This seems very unfortunate especially since
boost can get us ADL swap without that in C++03. Does anyone know if
this is still true?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk