Re: [boost] [swap] Workaround for ADL failures of MSVC 7.1 and Borland okay?

From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-02 13:15:09

AMDG

Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 wrote:
> Yes it does!!!  :-)  Workaround "a" does the job! I tested locally, for
> msvc-9.0, msvc-7.1, and borland-5.82.
>
> <snip>
>
> Do you think it would be okay to just apply workaround "a", as attached
> hereby?  I mean, would it harm for other toolsets to have "using
> namespace std;" within the boost_swap_impl::swap_impl function?
>   

I think it's ok.  A using directive is just as correct as a using 
declaration,
so it shouldn't break any of the more conformant compilers.
I've tested it on gcc and como.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe