From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-11 15:07:16
on Mon Aug 11 2008, Vladimir Prus <vladimir-AT-codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Beman Dawes wrote:
>>> I worked *extremely* hard to make sure that the instructions as they now
>>> stand will *not* cause people to run into stupid issues that prevent
>>> them from getting started with Boost or decide that Boost is hard to
>>> use, and it's very frustrating to see the potential problems taken so
>> I agree. This was the straw that broke the camel's back as far as I'm
>> concerned. I've lost all interest in supporting the current Boost.Build
>> system and look forward to moving one hundred percent to something
>> better, more responsive to user needs, and less likely to break the
>> release process at unexpected moments.
> Hmm? The behavior change been discussed happened for 1.35. And if you
> read the discussion in #1744, I'll be happy to help with whatever behaviour
> change is desired, as soon as everybody agrees on what behaviour should be
> (and reading the comments does not leave me with impression that any concrete
> suggestion was made, by anybody).
Rene made a concrete suggestion in
> The problem here, apparently, is in the
> process, whereby:
> - The folks who discussed behaviour change for 1.35 did not communicate to
> Dave that getting-started needs to be adjusted.
> - Dave did not communicate to you that he considers this issue critical
I'm sorry, yes, I did. At least, I made what I think of as valiant
efforts to do so.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk