Boost logo

Boost :

From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-15 19:39:10

David Abrahams wrote:
> on Fri Aug 15 2008, Stefan Seefeld <> wrote:
>> Why can't the packaging process be automatized, making it fully
>> reproducible ? Trying to increase the amount of tests run on the final
>> package attacs the problem from the wrong end, IMO.
> reproducability != correctness.
> I agree that automation is a good idea, but it might also be a good idea
> to test the results of that automation, neh?
Indeed. My point, however, was that I would *first* automatize, *then*
validate. The point of reproducibility is to cut down on the amount of
(repeated) validation you have to do afterwards, no ? :-)


      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at