Re: [boost] Should we provide hot fixes?

From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-18 10:38:07

2008/8/18 Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]>:

> * Under release 1.36.0, there would be a changeset number, a description of
> the problem, and a directory-location:
>
>      48192  Restore deprecated basic_directory_entry names inadvertently
> removed. (boost/filesystem)
>
> * The changeset number would link to
> http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/48192

We really should put the fixes on their own branch, called something
like 'branches/fixes_1_36_0' or 'branches/fixes/1_36_0' (since we want
to distinguish fixes from releases). This would be branched from
release at the point of release (or maybe from the release tag).

Daniel