Re: [boost] New libraries should provide forward declarations?

From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-20 15:06:19

On 20/08/2008, Daniel James <daniel_james_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 20/08/2008, Simonson, Lucanus J <lucanus.j.simonson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>  >
>  >  I third the question, should we make separating template declarations
>  >  from their definitions a preferred practice?
>
>
> Some libraries don't do this because they still support older
>  compilers where template functions have to be defined inline.

Sorry, jargon mishap. I meant 'template functions have to be defined
in the class declaration'.