Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-27 05:32:43

Next message: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31: "Re: [boost] Enabling fast swap optimization for Boost types VC9 SP1."
Previous message: Dean Michael Berris: "[boost] Point Release Management and Development Sponsorship (WAS Re: [next release] Any new libraries ready for the nextrelease?)"
In reply to: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] Should we provide hot fixes?"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Should we provide hot fixes?"

2008/8/27 Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]>:

> even the phrase "draft standard" standard seems like an oxymoron
> to me. I'm presuming it means something like "proposed standard".

The full title is: 'Working Draft, Standard for Programming Language
C++'. I think 'draft standard' is a reasonable abbreviation.
Obviously, I'm relying on the context. I suppose something like 'the
C++0x draft' might be clearer and still brief.

Daniel

Next message: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31: "Re: [boost] Enabling fast swap optimization for Boost types VC9 SP1."
Previous message: Dean Michael Berris: "[boost] Point Release Management and Development Sponsorship (WAS Re: [next release] Any new libraries ready for the nextrelease?)"
In reply to: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] Should we provide hot fixes?"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Should we provide hot fixes?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk