From: Marshall Clow (marshall_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-27 09:54:30
At 5:37 AM -0800 8/27/08, David Abrahams wrote:
>on Tue Aug 26 2008, "Robert Ramey" <ramey-AT-rrsd.com> wrote:
>> Marshall Clow wrote:
>>> I wrote:
>>>> I was the one that wrote:
>>>> Basically, you can never remove an interface, because someone,
>>>> somewhere might be using it.
>>>> but Robert removed the line before that, where I said:
>>>> But that way lies madness.
>>> Another correction (this time on my part).
>>> I don't know that Robert removed that line; just that someone did.
>>> Sorry to cast aspersions.
>> I removed the line by accident, sorry.
>> Actually, I totally mis-interpreted what you said. I took it
>> to mean that the statement suggested that the madness lies
>> in the idea that you can never remove an interface. If
>> I understand now, you're in agreement that removing
>> or changing an existing interface creates a lot of problems
>> (madness?) and that using a new name is the preferred
>I think you had it right the first time.
Dave is correct.
I meant that never removing interfaces is madness.
Anyone remember the interface for iterators before the STL?
iter = <whatever>
while ( iter.more ())
// do stuff
Should iterators still support this - or is it a good thing that
Stepanov (and others) decided that they had a better way? [ This is
not just syntax, btw ]
-- -- Marshall Marshall Clow Idio Software <mailto:marshall_at_[hidden]> It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk