From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-27 12:33:18
Marshall Clow wrote:
> Dave is correct.
> I meant that never removing interfaces is madness.
> Anyone remember the interface for iterators before the STL?
> iter = <whatever>
> while ( iter.more ())
> // do stuff
> iter.next ();
before STL? Wasn't std a new namespace? Didn't it require
inclusion of a new header? That would
qualify as name change. I have no idea about the above code
but I don't think introduction of STL would prevent it compiling
> Should iterators still support this - or is it a good thing that
> Stepanov (and others) decided that they had a better way? [ This is
> not just syntax, btw ]
If I have a header x.hpp and I compile my code in the year 2000
I should be able to recompile it in the year 2008 without having
to debug it again.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk