|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-30 13:51:08
on Fri Aug 29 2008, "Mat Marcus" <mat-lists-AT-emarcus.org> wrote:
> For some of us the answer is not <shrug>. Are hotfixes really the way
> forward? Not to pick on filesystem, threads or xpressive, but hotfixes
> are a bit difficult to manage in a coporate environment. It's hard
> enough to get boost accepted/updated without having to defend against
> people who argue that it's too risky to use boost due to "inadequate
> quality control" e.g. "boost 1.35.0 didn't work out of the box
> (windows thread bugs, filesystem compilation errors, etc.), boost
> 1.36.0 doesn't work out of the box, and there are no dot-releases
> planned". It really helps if there is a perception of stable, high
> quality, official, numbered releases.
Hi Mat,
With apologies for the sales message: my company's Enterprise Support
program offers the closest possible equivalent of point releases for
Boost. We might be able to help you.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk