Subject: Re: [boost] lifetime of ranges vs. iterators
From: Arno Schödl (aschoedl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-03 13:42:59
> > We are simply trying to come up with a simple and clean trick to keep
> > iterator size under control.
> Really? IIUC so far we're only discussing compressing the size of
> ranges, unless we're willing to pay for indirection inside of iterators
> (I'm not).
No, we also had minimum size iterators. By "minimum size" I mean that each iterator contains the begin and end base (e.g., all the way up the stack) iterators + all functors involved, stored by value. This is really equivalent to a single iterator + boost::bind.
-- Dr. Arno Schoedl · aschoedl_at_[hidden] Technical Director think-cell Software GmbH · Invalidenstr. 34 · 10115 Berlin, Germany http://www.think-cell.com · phone +49-30-666473-10 · toll-free (US) +1-800-891-8091 Directors: Dr. Markus Hannebauer, Dr. Arno Schoedl · Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 85229
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk