Subject: Re: [boost] [thread_pool] Dependencies between tasks
From: Kowalke Oliver (QD IT PA SI) (Oliver.Kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-05 02:46:57
sequencing the access to the instance would be equivalent to chaining the tasks (== chained tasks are executed after each other -> as a sequence).
take a look at thread_pool at the vault http://www.boostpro.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=boost-threadpool.2.tar.gz&directory=Concurrent%20Programming&.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of vicente.botet
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 6:44 AM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [boost] [thread_pool] Dependencies between tasks
> the tread_pool pattern is very useful to improve parallelism.
> But sometimes we need to constraint this parallelism, for
> example when several task are related to the same 'instance'
> it could be safer to sequence them.
> Is there a mechanism that allows to do thinks like that on
> the thread_pool library?
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk