Re: [boost] Tests are a mess

Subject: Re: [boost] Tests are a mess
From: Gubenko, Boris (boris.gubenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-08 21:34:58

Gennaro Prota wrote:
> Are you suggesting that to me? If I had a HP-UX_ia64_aCC I
> wouldn't even bother
> looking at the test reports.

At Emil's request, I've started a full test. Just FYI.

-boris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Gennaro Prota
> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 9:30 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Tests are a mess
>
> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Emil Dotchevski
> <emil_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Gennaro Prota
> <gennaro.prota_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>>  Unsatisfied symbol "boost::exception_detail::refcount_ptr<..."
> >> This is my fault thanks for spotting it. I'm looking into
> it right now.
> >
> > This is a weird link error, but the "missing" destructor is inline.
>
> It's also the destructor of a class that should have nothing
> to do with
> dynamic_bitset (but who knows... it might be used by
> something used by something
> used by something else; the joys of Boost coupling)
>
> > It seems to be a build problem specific to the HP-UX_ia64_aCC test
> > site. The relevant change was introduced in revision 48634. This
> > revision has been tested, and has not caused any problems, on any
> > other test sites.
> >
> > I'm noticing that the HP-UX_ia64_aCC test is incremental. I
> have seen
> > similar failures before which were "fixed" by a
> non-incremental build.
> >
> > Rather than panicking, I suggest trying a non-incremental build
>
> Are you suggesting that to me? If I had a HP-UX_ia64_aCC I
> wouldn't even bother
> looking at the test reports.
>
> --
> Genny
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>