Subject: Re: [boost] Tests are a mess
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-10 20:55:40
Pete Bartlett wrote:
> Robert Ramey wrote:
>> [..] But don't go foisting on me a whole new layer of work [...]
> Sadly, by introducing boost::serialization::throw_exception, you have
> foisted work on me and other users of your library. Now we have to
> boost::serialization::throw_exception instead of just having one
> boost::throw_exception. This is exactly the kind of breakage you've
> been so strongly opposed to.
You're blaming the victim here. This problem isn't caused by me, I felt I
other reasonable alternative.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk